Bi Zhijian, deputy director of the Guangdong Provincial Economic and Trade Commission, said recently that the central government will provide special funds to subsidize the promotion and use of energy-saving lamps. The first batch of promotion tasks in Guangdong is 3 million, the largest in the country. “If you buy a 7-watt general-purpose bulb-type energy-saving lamp, ordinary residents only need to spend 3.65 yuan, which is about the same as ordinary light bulbs.†(Guangzhou Daily, June 17)
Energy conservation is a basic strategy of the country and is related to the sustainable development of China's economy. According to a statistics from the National Development and Reform Commission, at present, China's lighting electricity consumption accounts for about 12% of the total electricity consumption of the whole society. If all the existing ordinary incandescent lamps are replaced with energy-saving lamps, the country can save more than 60 billion kWh per year. It is almost equivalent to the annual power generation of the Three Gorges Hydropower Station. This is an amazing energy saving account.
But unfortunately, energy-saving lamps are not well applied. The main reason is: the price of energy-saving lamps is too expensive, 10 times higher than incandescent lamps; the quality of ordinary energy-saving lamps is not good, and it will be broken after half a year of normal use. Once the account is settled, the electricity is saved, but the money is not saved, even more expensive than using incandescent lamps. For another example, an energy-saving refrigerator is 600-800 yuan higher than a non-energy-saving refrigerator, and an energy-saving refrigerator saves 0.3 kWh per day, calculated at 0.5 yuan per kilowatt hour. Then it takes 14 years to save 766 yuan. You can save it in 14 years. The money was prepaid to the manufacturer of the refrigerator. Energy-saving refrigerators may not be able to use 14 years!
Things are so strange. We know the great significance of energy conservation. We also call on ordinary people to use energy-saving electrical appliances, but they do not solve the problem of "saving electricity and not saving money." And our people are "little people are good at profit". If you can't save money, what is the use of big political significance? Does the government want ordinary people to spend more on their own money to save energy for the society? Few people are willing to do such a thing.
Now, our government finally understands that economic problems can only be solved by economic means. To encourage ordinary people to use energy-saving lamps, as long as there is a "saving money" one is enough, even the great meaning does not need to talk much. On May 8 this year, the National Development and Reform Commission issued the Interim Measures for the Administration of Financial Subsidy Funds for Efficient Lighting Products Promotion, saying that the state will provide 30% for large-scale users, 50% for urban and rural residents, and 50% for urban and rural residents. At the same time, during the “Eleventh Five-Year Plan†period, China will promote 150 million high-efficiency lighting products through financial subsidies, gradually replacing incandescent lamps and other inefficient lighting products. Guangdong Province is actively promoting, the first batch will promote 3 million. When buying a 7-watt energy-saving lamp and a regular bulb, we knocked out a roadblock on the road to promote energy-saving lamps.
The government should be considered a big account, paying for energy, it reflects the ruling wisdom. There are already many such advanced deeds, and we should praise the shrewd government. In 2006, Suzhou City has spent 10 million yuan to upgrade the old-fashioned faucets and toilets of 40,000 households in advance, and plans to renovate 100,000 water-saving appliances in the city in three years. Why use public funds to invest in private toilets? Because through improvement, each family can save 1.26 tons of water per month. The 100,000 households in the city need to save nearly 130,000 tons of tap water per month on the toilet water, saving 3.12 million yuan. In this way, the Suzhou municipal government used public funds to invest in private toilets, and it took less than a year to “receive†all of the investment. At the same time as the residents benefit, the government has also received a huge “affordableâ€: because every ton of water saved, it can generally produce 0.8 tons of domestic sewage, so that the entire urban area can reduce hundreds of thousands of tons of sewage every month. It has greatly eased the pressure on urban water supply and sewage treatment, and reduced financial input. Moreover, saving valuable water resources has increased the wealth of the government.
It can be seen that the government has spent a small amount of money, but it is of great significance to promoting energy conservation, emission reduction and energy storage. We hope that more governments will be smarter and learn to count big accounts instead of dying in their pockets. Learn to solve economic problems in accordance with economic rules, and not superstitious in the function of ideological education.
Energy conservation is a basic strategy of the country and is related to the sustainable development of China's economy. According to a statistics from the National Development and Reform Commission, at present, China's lighting electricity consumption accounts for about 12% of the total electricity consumption of the whole society. If all the existing ordinary incandescent lamps are replaced with energy-saving lamps, the country can save more than 60 billion kWh per year. It is almost equivalent to the annual power generation of the Three Gorges Hydropower Station. This is an amazing energy saving account.
But unfortunately, energy-saving lamps are not well applied. The main reason is: the price of energy-saving lamps is too expensive, 10 times higher than incandescent lamps; the quality of ordinary energy-saving lamps is not good, and it will be broken after half a year of normal use. Once the account is settled, the electricity is saved, but the money is not saved, even more expensive than using incandescent lamps. For another example, an energy-saving refrigerator is 600-800 yuan higher than a non-energy-saving refrigerator, and an energy-saving refrigerator saves 0.3 kWh per day, calculated at 0.5 yuan per kilowatt hour. Then it takes 14 years to save 766 yuan. You can save it in 14 years. The money was prepaid to the manufacturer of the refrigerator. Energy-saving refrigerators may not be able to use 14 years!
Things are so strange. We know the great significance of energy conservation. We also call on ordinary people to use energy-saving electrical appliances, but they do not solve the problem of "saving electricity and not saving money." And our people are "little people are good at profit". If you can't save money, what is the use of big political significance? Does the government want ordinary people to spend more on their own money to save energy for the society? Few people are willing to do such a thing.
Now, our government finally understands that economic problems can only be solved by economic means. To encourage ordinary people to use energy-saving lamps, as long as there is a "saving money" one is enough, even the great meaning does not need to talk much. On May 8 this year, the National Development and Reform Commission issued the Interim Measures for the Administration of Financial Subsidy Funds for Efficient Lighting Products Promotion, saying that the state will provide 30% for large-scale users, 50% for urban and rural residents, and 50% for urban and rural residents. At the same time, during the “Eleventh Five-Year Plan†period, China will promote 150 million high-efficiency lighting products through financial subsidies, gradually replacing incandescent lamps and other inefficient lighting products. Guangdong Province is actively promoting, the first batch will promote 3 million. When buying a 7-watt energy-saving lamp and a regular bulb, we knocked out a roadblock on the road to promote energy-saving lamps.
The government should be considered a big account, paying for energy, it reflects the ruling wisdom. There are already many such advanced deeds, and we should praise the shrewd government. In 2006, Suzhou City has spent 10 million yuan to upgrade the old-fashioned faucets and toilets of 40,000 households in advance, and plans to renovate 100,000 water-saving appliances in the city in three years. Why use public funds to invest in private toilets? Because through improvement, each family can save 1.26 tons of water per month. The 100,000 households in the city need to save nearly 130,000 tons of tap water per month on the toilet water, saving 3.12 million yuan. In this way, the Suzhou municipal government used public funds to invest in private toilets, and it took less than a year to “receive†all of the investment. At the same time as the residents benefit, the government has also received a huge “affordableâ€: because every ton of water saved, it can generally produce 0.8 tons of domestic sewage, so that the entire urban area can reduce hundreds of thousands of tons of sewage every month. It has greatly eased the pressure on urban water supply and sewage treatment, and reduced financial input. Moreover, saving valuable water resources has increased the wealth of the government.
It can be seen that the government has spent a small amount of money, but it is of great significance to promoting energy conservation, emission reduction and energy storage. We hope that more governments will be smarter and learn to count big accounts instead of dying in their pockets. Learn to solve economic problems in accordance with economic rules, and not superstitious in the function of ideological education.
Electronic Fence System, Gps Tracker,Gps Tracker (4,824) ,Gps
Electronic Fence System,Bird Repeller System Co., Ltd. , http://www.nbelectronicfence.com